[html4all] Omitting alt Attribute for Critical Content Wiki page
aurélien levy
aurelien.levy at free.fr
Wed Oct 24 01:41:05 PDT 2007
Hi,
I am not Gez but here is my opinion on that subject :
I think the flicker example is a wrong argument because it's not a
really problem to have a an empty alt the only concern is if the photo
is in a link to download it. Otherwise we already have meta data like
tags and title and description.
Flickr is used as a photo sharing website so I can use it with two
different goals :
- search photo with a specific word to download it
- search photo with a specific word to look at it
- look and or download my friend photo
If I don't provide meta data on my photo nobody can reach it, if the
photo have meta data and is in a link to download it I have to put in
the alt something like "download this picture - jpg - xx Ko" because
the meta data are already on the page and there is only one picture by page.
In the case where user want to "look" at photo my only concern is not to
have an alt it's to have a good meta data description and good
description must be used with longdesc and longdesc can link to an
#description anchor where the description is in the page. For the alt I
just can take title, tags, or generic word as "photo"
If I don't provide description blind user can't "look" at the picture
but at minimum they can know the subject of the photo with tags or title
and if they just really want to "look" they will go on picture who have
a good description.
(Flickr can provide a search form who search only in the description
meta data to help that)
Aurélien Levy
> Hi Gez,
> I do think there are situations where the user will not provide
> (although they should) alt texts. the example cited in the HTML 5 spec
> is that of bulk uploads to photosites. What is to be done in this
> case?
More information about the List_HTML4all.org
mailing list