[html4all] From Ian H
Philip-and-LeKhanh at Royal-Tunbridge-Wells.Org
Tue Aug 28 16:07:29 PDT 2007
Sorry, the "he" was defined in the Subject header !
Here is the full citation :
> On Tue, 28 Aug 2007, Alex Mogilevsky wrote:
>> The change I am proposing would in fact describe Firefox behavior
> What? No it wouldn't. The current text is correct. What testcases are you
> talking about? Like David said, please demonstrate your case with the many
> hundreds of test cases it would take to prove your case before trying to
> change the spec here.
>> The way it is put now, it doesn't match any browser (since top border
>> removes any effect of nested empty blocks).
> So? Even if this were true, let's at least give the implementations a
> chance to fix their code to match the spec before we start changing the
> spec. If we keep moving the goal posts, browser vendors are going to stop
> paying attention to us. Can we please leave this alone for several more
> years before we start changing everything again?
> Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL
> http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,.
> Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Robert Burns wrote:
> Could you give us the context here? I can't tell who 'he' is or where
> you're quoting from.
> Take care,
More information about the List_HTML4all.org