[html4all] ALT issue redux
Joshue O Connor
joshue.oconnor at cfit.ie
Tue Feb 5 03:19:15 PST 2008
> > Josh and I would seem to be agreed that "refuse to process
> > such a page in the browser" is justified for a critical-content image
> > that is lacking @alt.
Just to be clear, I would not want the browser to refuse to render the
page even if a critical alt is missing. That would be a situation where
the cure is worse than the disease.
> 3. WCAG requires @alt (WCAG1) or the function that in HTML4
> is provided by @alt (WCAG2) [editorial note -- add links]
I want the @alt to be mandatory for critical content for conformance for
WCAG 1.0 and also [insert new attribute here] for WCAG 2.0.
That puts accessibility into the right domain. Should the browser still
continue to render pages that don't conform, yes. Should authors right
better code and mark-up content in a proper way, yes. Should the browser
not render a page that is not proper or does not conform? No.
Cheers
Josh
More information about the List_HTML4all.org
mailing list