[html4all] ALT issue redux
John Foliot
foliot at wats.ca
Tue Feb 5 10:33:42 PST 2008
Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
> It is backwards compatible because valid XHTML1 will always also be
> valid HTML5. Also, browsers that currently support XHTML1 won't choke
> on missing @alt. Backwards compatibility (and the "two serialisations"
> thing) doesn't mean that HTML5 can simply be converted down to XHTML1
> (in which case making a mandatory attribute optional *would* be a
> breach).
>
> I'm not defending the decision to make @alt optional, mind...just
> working out the logic that lets HTML WG do it while still following
> the backwards-compatibility principle.
>
Gotcha - thanks Patrick. Still feels regressive to me...
More information about the List_HTML4all.org
mailing list